So I recently had a uni interview for engineering and got asked some (what I thought) interesting questions 1) You have a drawer of 10 blue socks and 10 red socks. Imagine you're in the dark, how many single socks do you have to take out to guarantee you have a matching pair? 2) There are three rooms: Room A contains raging fires. Room B contains Lions which haven't eaten for 3 years. Room C contains murderers waiting for you. Which room should you enter? 3) You have 6 glasses lined up, 1,2,3,4,5,6. Glasses 1,2,3 are filled with orange juice. 4,5,6 are empty. By moving only ONE glass, how do you create a situation where the glasses are alternately filled with juice? I'll post up some others if you like these, answers will follow
11 ? the one with the dead lions ? pour 2 into 5 ? nope, thats not right..3 into 5 and put it back between 1 and 2 ?
No 1 = 3 No need to get out 11, because with 3 you either get all 3 the same colour, or 2 of one colour and 1 the other.
And similarly, if you wanted 2 pairs, you'd take out 5 socks Another question: You have a biased coin (It might favour heads say). How can you use it to make an unbiased decision by flipping it?
The default biased coin answer is to keep flipping until you get an equal number of heads/tails Eg 1) head. - don't accept it yet 2) tail - that's 50/50 so accept heads Or 1) head 2) head 3) tail 4) tail 50/50 again so then accept heads My problem with the default answer is the bias has been heads, when 50/50 occurs the first to meet the equal number will be the biased side Therefore the biased answer has been obtained in a mathematically unbiased way But does that mean you select the alternate side - it would still mean you have a bias What he theory does is to extrapolate and proove that at some point on a 50/50 throw of a coin what appears to be a bias can eventually be made 50/50 if you keep on going an infinite number of times If it really is biased then heads, heads, heads, heads etc does not help you
1) 3, as explained above 2) C - you can reason with murderers but not lions or fires xD 3) Pour glass 2's contents in to glass 5 maybe a legal career was the wrong choice for me?
2) none of the rooms, the first and third are dangerous and the lion one stinks of rotting lion corpses. Instead ring 999, report the fire and the murderers, or lock all three rooms and let the fire spread taking care of the lion corpses and the murderers and go and have a cup of tea at home instead.
For the coin problem, what someone suggested was that: You flip twice. If you get heads then heads again dismiss it. If you get tails then tails again, dismiss it. These probabilities are obviously not 0.25 exactly because of the biased coin. What you should instead do is assign choice A to heads then tails. Assign choice B to tails then heads. Since the probabilities for either choice A or B are the same, you can make the unbiased decision
Just tell the murderers and Lions that you will be announcing your decision in Room 1, and that they should wait for you there. Then you can enter room 2 or 3 right away.
There'sa big difference between the skills required for a job and those required for a practical degree like engineering.
These kinds of questions are directed to thought processes and analysing a situation. Very appropriate to a skill such as engiineering, and as in the original post they were questions for a university interview. A situation where the mindset of the individual for suitabiliity of course and as compared to another individual when filling available spaces. It can also be a matter of how important the questions are in the interview. It may be whether you can get the right or optimum answer, it could also just be a question to gauge the interviewees response or to get any answer and then see if they can elaborate on why that is their answer. I am an interviewer and they are not the sort of questions I ask, but that is because I have a corporate policy and criteria on interviews. I am after an example from the interviewee of a situation to demonstrate their 'competence' in an area of skills - then see if I can work out they are giving me textbook answers or they can elaborate on what they did, what they would do better etc. In addition to the generic skills/competences I also want to see who will be best suited to the specific job, I can get some clues from someones experience, but that only tells me if they have done something similar and leaves out the potential someone may have - especially someone looking for their first job. That puts me in the situation of trying to get something extra out of the interview, part of that is the general conversation around the questions. I could not ask questions like the examples above, but I can work things around to pick people appropriate for the job.
I'd rather be asked these questions than the normal job interview ones like "why do you want this job?" to which there are only two true answers. Either you're coming from another job and the true answer is "while I've no doubt this job is equal to my current one in that the endless tedium is occasionally interrupted with moments of stunning ineptitude from the people around me it pays slightly better". Or if you're out of work " because the Internet is running out of porn that I haven't seen".
different unis bring up all sorts of weird questions. wait until you go for placements and they do phone interviews. My house mate has had a few and he was obsessing about how to answer the phone.
1) You need to take three to be guaranteed a pair. That way you will either get a red pair, a blue pair or one of each from the first two picks, so you'll either have a pair already or be in a position where one sock of either colour would give you a pair on the third pick. 2) Room B because after 3 years without food there wouldn't be any lions left alive. 3) You pick up glass 2 and pour the contents into glass 5. I actually got asked question 1 & 3 one my University interview for Engineering last year!