Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Opus Finale .... A Warts an' all Exposé of Paintball's Very Own Megalomaniac

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Wonder if he's managed to pay Wendy now he's had an event...?
The last I heard was, he hasn't paid her.
The last I heard in reference to the 20 grand he still owed Manfred (Maxs) was that it also hadn't been paid up. He could of course have paid them already but last time I looked, there were no flying pigs but let's hope I'm wrong on that one.
I just hope they eventually get what's owed them because the longer this all lasts, then the less chance there is of a full settlement, in my opinion anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gambo47

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
For the sake of accuracy, I've been told that Wendy has got her money which is a great thing for her because a thousand pound is a lot of dosh to be owed.

I think barnett fully realised that he'd better pay her because Wendy is well liked and well respected and for barnett to pull one of his strokes on her would incite a storm of abuse from people.
I'll go ask what's going on with the other money he owes ... as soon as I find anything different from what I've already posted then I will make the appropriate change ....

oh, just one more tiny detail:--

barnett ... grow some bollox and answer these questions below, there's only four of them and so please feel free to answer when it's convenient, today would be nice timothy, my boy:-


1) Is it a lie that the restaurant business that he ran, Kings Hall Restaurant and Carvery Ltd, was forced into liquidation by creditors in January 2009 with liabilities of £153,000?

2) Is it a lie that he then also filed for personal Bankruptcy in Oct 2009?

3) Is it a lie that he was arrested for Conspiracy to supply a Class B drug in July 2005 and received a 12 month Suspended Sentence?

4) Is it a lie that his entry denial to the USA in 2011, wasn't actually because of a fight in Birmingham in 2010, since the charges were dropped due to an uncooperative victim?

The reason those particular questions have been posed to barnett is because we know he has denied certain events that those four questions address ... some of his defenders have been deliberately lied to concerning those questions and so, there is a bigger picture here in the sense we need those people to realise he has lied to them .... I couldn't give a monkey's ass about any of his pathetic little companies but being as we know he's lied to certain people regarding the events mentioned, this is the reason those particular questions have been raised ...
He really needs to address those questions .. the longer he ignores them, the more guilty he becomes ...problem is, his lies have painted him to a corner that we can all now bear witness to ...
 

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Concerning the money he owes Manfred [Maxs] - allegedly, barnett has graciously agreed to pay off the 20 grand debt at a rate of a grand a month which obviously beggars the question; why hasn't the self-proclaimed high-roller paid the debt off in one go like most normal people do?
There are of course but two possibilities here neither of which says much about the integrity of the man.

Either he hasn't got the dosh which is strange since he took all the money for the paint at the event which if true, kinda suggests he's robbing Peter to pay Paul, a juggling act that proves successful only if there is a constant stream of money coming in from alternate sources.

The other possibility is, he's got the money but he's just being an as$hole and making Manfred wait which of course would be most people's knee-jerk guess knowing the way he is but I'm afraid it's more than likely the former ...
Having to pay off a debt in such a piecemeal fashion to the tune of 20 large is an embarrassing endeavour in the business world - it tends to send out all the wrong signals and begins to erode confidence in his ability to conduct business in an honourable fashion.
Come to think of it, the notion of 'honourable' and 'barnett' in the same sentence reeks of an oxymoron which is quite appropriate if you sever the first three letters, 'oxy'.

When a company struggles to juggle debts on the principle of 'Peter paying Paul' then I'm afraid there's a good chance of it all going Ping-Pong somewhere down the road especially when you factor in the declining trend of customers who turn up at his events [Ex: The Blackout event] - of course though, sponsored teams do not really count because discounted support packages don't attract the same margins when discounting them paint and gear.
The illusion of 'sponsorship' is of course upheld which secures the tenure of those teams to his events but it's not really a significant income stream, certainly not enough to secure the liquidity of his companies' cash train.
All in all, whilst he continues to 'whistle past the graveyard', the real effects of these past weeks have begun to taint his whole façade.
The process has begun .....

Oh, by the way, barnett, have you forgotten something?
Here's the merest of hints .....

1) Is it a lie that the restaurant business that he ran, Kings Hall Restaurant and Carvery Ltd, was forced into liquidation by creditors in January 2009 with liabilities of £153,000?

2) Is it a lie that he then also filed for personal Bankruptcy in Oct 2009?

3) Is it a lie that he was arrested for Conspiracy to supply a Class B drug in July 2005 and received a 12 month Suspended Sentence?

4) Is it a lie that his entry denial to the USA in 2011, wasn't actually because of a fight in Birmingham in 2010, since the charges were dropped due to an uncooperative victim?

Another day of silence re those questions above, another nail in the coffin of guilt gets hammered home.
Address them and this all goes away barnett ....
Come on, shut me up, be a man if you can ....... but I kinda doubt that's beyond you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spikerz

stongle

Crazy Elk. Mooooooooooo
Aug 23, 2002
2,842
67
83
60
The Wynn
Visit site
Wow, and I thought my moral compass was fcukedup. Tim, fancy coming dwarf tossing with me sometime? I have a ponzi scheme to discuss your might like the sound of!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exile

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Bloody heck Glenn, where you been all this time????
You still living round the corner from me or have you fuhk'd off back to Essex???

As for barnett ??
He really is a piece of work Glenn, I think the worse I've ever seen in paintball anyway.
Mind you, from what I'm hearing now, the slope is starting to steepen for him with numbers declining and with winter just around the corner, it's gonna get awful slippery for him ... mind how you go barnett, you might end up on your ass but better that way than on the end of a right-hander, eh?
Unless of course you fancy your chances barnett ? ..... but for an invertebrate such as yourself, being a man is obviously beyond you :/
 

stongle

Crazy Elk. Mooooooooooo
Aug 23, 2002
2,842
67
83
60
The Wynn
Visit site
Nah, still in bandit country but moved a few miles. Hope you are all doing well. Rumours of the LIBOR fixings are all false, although Scotland Yard does do a lovely macciato and the mini pain aux chocolates are nice too.

Having been away for a while, it seems little has changed wrt some of those involved in the industry. Although, I have to say present company aside player apathy appears to still be a big issue (even if sheisty c**ts start to get their cumuppence).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exile

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Heads Up - Attendances down .....

For those who maybe interested, here's an update on the Metropolitan Police's armed support unit storming of my humble abode.

barnett has lost no opportunity in personally telling people he's getting the police involved and has also secured the services of a solicitor to begin legal proceedings against myself.

As of yet, I've not had one Mr Plod come knocking nor have I received one letter advising me of an impending case aimed my way.

But how can this be - why on earth would he tell people he's doing these things when it's self-evidently not the case ??

I don't wanna shock anyone here but it could be he's lying ... hardly a novel experience for him but in this particular case, it's a lie with a sting in the tail, leastwise for him it is because somewhere down the line, he's gonna get found out because the police nor any legal people have come through my front door either by its hinges or its letterbox.

He's indulging in what he has done many times before, it's a short-term lie to satisfy his ego when he talks to people personally .. lying is hardly a revolutionary concept when it comes to barnett I know ... it is of course rather embarrassing for him because it inevitably focusses interest on his abject inability to do one damn thing to deal with myself, the other posters or indeed, existence of this thread.

The Law ....and all that entails.

I think it's crucial to realise that if any of the things that have been posted in this thread had been untrue, I would have heard of something .. and I haven't !!
He has an obvious problem inasmuch as if he engages the services of a solicitor, they will see the culmination of their work in the court of law somewhere and that's where barnett's problem really begins.
barnett cannot possibly win the case, and he knows it - the last thing barnett needs is another big fat legal invoice slapped across his bank account.

As to why he cannot win it?
I'll let you guys work that out but you won't be needing the services of Sherlock Holmes... :)

As for the police?

Oh purrleeease, what the hell are they gonna do anyways ... there are a million and one 'disagreements' on forums across the internet, nothing illegal has been done anyway.
Using strict legal terminology here, barnett is well and truly fuhk'd - all show, no go !
As I previously mentioned in this thread, the one person who is ultimately gonna bring barnett down is of course ... barnett himself - he just cannot stop himself from trying to maintain this ridiculous façade by telling others he's doing this or that to stop me - his ego just cannot admit to his own impotence in such matters.
If his personality wasn't so repulsive and abhorrent, he'd cut the figure of a rather miserable, pathetic individual but maybe that's what he's always been anyway.
 

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,114
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Threads such as this have a somewhat predictable life-time and barnett is well aware of this - he's also long since realised he can't do fuhk all about it which inevitably paints him tightly into a corner; he now has to just sit there like a naughty little boy and take all this shi!t ... And in doing so, he realises there is but one possible chance of salvation, and that is, time passing ... he has no choice but to hope the damage is recoverable.

We've already seen some embarrassing consequences where he's had to cancel events but even then, he will lapse into complete denial as to the reasons why he's had to close these events - his ego just will not entertain any notion of this thread having an effect on him or his business.


My supposed role in the media is to report on all facets of our sport, both good and bad, just like they do in any other sport.
In barnett's case, I have to make him accountable for some of the things he's done, and I will continue to fulfil that role for the foreseeable future.

I won't let up all the time his insidious tentacles infiltrate our beloved sport and if people decide to maintain their associations with him, they must realise it will be against a back-drop of this thread being constantly updated.
There is one particular update I'm waiting on, and if it happens, I'll personally take great pleasure in announcing on here.

In the meantime, this thread will serve as a constant reminder to us all when warning signs are ignored and people default to doing nothing.
If I can't do my job re someone like barnett then WTF am I doing in the media anyway?
It would be a dereliction of duty if I didn't go for him but I fully understand why people think it's personal with me, it is 'yes', but that doesn't mean barnett should be left alone or treated differently just because I have a personal issue with him - it doesn't make him any the less responsible, and just makes me even more determined.

He's the one who elected to betray many of the people he's been associated with, good people such as Steve Baldwin, Paul Bank and Simon Cole, Ged Green, all of whom are reasonable-minded individuals just trying to move paintball forward.

And it wasn't until they came into contact with barnett, did they encounter the type of treachery and behaviours that he indulges himself in.
barnett wants to move paintball forward just as long as he can screw every last penny out of whichever venture, or whoever he's gotten involved with.
And anyone who gets in the way of that, is either betrayed or he attempts to discredit them by whatever means possible with the 'Pete Russell' incident being head and shoulders above anything I've previously heard in paintball.

We can't ascribe any legitimate reasons as to the motives behind the betrayal of these people, it's just part of barnett's make-up, it's who he is, it's what he does.
There is no underlying rationale to explain why he does this, you merely have to acknowledge his psychotic make-up.

If he was to remain unchecked in our sport, things would get worse and that's exactly why this thread was created, and that's why it will remain here for posterity.

barnett also possesses the sort of face you just wanna punch, I don't really know what it is about his face that makes me want to relocate his nose but the desire doesn't go away.

He really has no place in paintball and the only way our sport can protect itself from him is to refuse to put money in his pocket and point-blank decline to attend his events or deal with in any way - anything less than that is a slap in the face to all the people barnett has wronged - if people continue to deal with barnett after what we've learned then something is fundamentally wrong with our sport and industry.

Either people like Steve Baldwin, Ged Green, Paul Banks, Simon Cole, Gadget, Rebel Tackleberry myself and a whole slew of other people are lying about him or .... any person electing to continue to deal with barnett is bereft of any sense of responsibility or indeed, morality.

And I can legitimately use the word 'morality' without eliciting accusations of overkill because of the depths barnett stooped to in trying to discredit Pete Russell in the aforementioned incident - in all of my time in paintball, I have genuinely NEVER heard of anything so sickening.

What he did to discredit Pete Russell belies belief - he should be absolutely ashamed of himself but what makes matters worse, he actually used that situation for his own ends to subvert the truth to a friend of mine - barnett has zero morality, any father doing what he did, doesn't deserve to be one.

He's a sociopathic megalomaniac with no real appreciation of what's wrong with him, he cannot change, it's beyond him - our sport needs to flush him from our system.

Please, please, let me pull paintball's bog-chain and flush him down into the sewer back where he belongs ......

As for a last reminder - to my knowledge, barnett has refused to answer, address or deny any of the four questions posted by Rebel Tackelberry earlier in this thread.
And that's because barnett dare not ....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.