I never suggested you did and so perhaps this comment would have been better directed at Leach.Robbo, at no point have i defended London shock's actions nor do i wish to as leach has correctly mentioned.
Hmmm, I'm a little confused after reading that but I gather you think me banning them, was somewhat over the top ..... hmmmm.... maybes, but this site is predominated by ballers, all of whom I would presume, prefer not to mingle with sh!t.And to answer your question no, i don't fully understand as the intention of my added emotions was in no way to be-little you. It appears to me that you have jumped to the conclusion that i have in some way "sided" with shock. You are correct, i did choose to structure my post in the way that i did, however the use of my "" May have been that maybe their actions (or more so their reactions on this public forum) deserved such punishment.
You don't know me 'no', and 'yes', you did hit a nerve, a nerve you knew full well was exposed after reading that other thread.I dont claim to know you personally but ive obviously hit a nerve, my comment served no other purpose than a statement which is no secret. My post had no intention of having any hidden meaning or a cheaky rabbit punch.
Perhaps i shall put more thoughts (or less) into my posts in future.
The intent I suspected was not to gain a response from me but to direct a veiled insult .... I'm not really into receiving veiled insults on my own site mag.I can assure you my post had no intention of gaining any more of a response than the contact details for said organisation.
Disappointed maybe Bon but I'm not the person this guy obviously thinks I am, and that pis$es me off slightly.
He won't get banned Bon, and so please put the pitchfork away mate.