Good news for .50, the mark on hard surfaces seem to be pretty much the same. i know this might look dumb lol but what would be nice is to see someone being shot from distance, with one ball then the other, and see how it marks on the jerseys being used by someone since this obviously affects how the paint spreads.
Also one thing folks testing the paint have been claiming is that .68 can hit stuff and break at longer distances. Can you confirm this piper from your personal experience...
As to the major contribution this will be for a site starting fresh is think theres no doubt. Cheaper paint = more income, which makes the site more profitable in several ways, people pay less probably will play more and come back more often. There might be some investment for those that already own loads of material already, but... any change like this has consequences, in the long run it might turn out to be better for the rec player. My doubt still stands regarding tourn players, where most will prob prefer the more efficient ball, thats where my questions go..
Also one thing folks testing the paint have been claiming is that .68 can hit stuff and break at longer distances. Can you confirm this piper from your personal experience...
As to the major contribution this will be for a site starting fresh is think theres no doubt. Cheaper paint = more income, which makes the site more profitable in several ways, people pay less probably will play more and come back more often. There might be some investment for those that already own loads of material already, but... any change like this has consequences, in the long run it might turn out to be better for the rec player. My doubt still stands regarding tourn players, where most will prob prefer the more efficient ball, thats where my questions go..
